grant.codes

Jump to menu
  • About
  • Contact
  • Projects
  • Updates
  • More...Likes
  • Photos
  • Galleries
  • Replies
πŸ‘ˆπŸ•ΈπŸ’πŸ‘‰

Liked https://cloudisland.nz/@ehashman/112181912605865430

e. hashman

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://mastodon.cloud/@spaceninja/112170072503608349

Old Man Vandehey (@[email protected])

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://social.lol/@robb/112172909836932755

Robb Knight (@[email protected])

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://social.vivaldi.net/@brucelawson/112149984509581262

Bruce Lawson (@[email protected])

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://mastodon.social/@owa/112161128103200823

Open Web Advocacy (@[email protected])

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://www.404media.co/404-media-now-has-a-full-text-rss-feed/

404 Media Now Has a Full Text RSS Feed

Since we launched 404 Media in August, the most common request we’ve gotten from our subscribers is for an RSS feed that contains the full text of all of our articles. We are proud and excited to announce that today, we have finally figured out how to make this available to all of our paid subscribers. If you’re already a subscriber, you can find your feed here. If you want to become a subscriber, you can subscribe here. 

Creating this feed was logistically quite complicated. We are thankful to Maxime Valette of FeedPress, who helped us make the feed, and to Ryan Singel of Outpost, who helped us sync the paid feeds with our Ghost member list. We’re also thankful to our paid subscribers, who have made it possible for us to pay for the development work needed to offer this and have also been very patient with us as we’ve worked behind the scenes to develop this feature. 

We feel strongly that offering full text RSS is the right thing to do, and that offering RSS in this way can help small, journalist-owned publications like ours better connect with our subscribers and can offer another path forward as we attempt to reach our reader directly, without having to rely exclusively on Google’s declining search engine or fractured social media algorithms that consistently devalue outbound links. We believe that this is the first time that custom, paid full-text RSS feeds have been offered on a site using the Ghost CMS. This is the CMS we use, and we are proud that our site is leading the way for other Ghost-based publishers to now also offer RSS feeds if they wish. With the hard development work now done, FeedPress and Outpost can now offer the feeds as a service to more Ghost sites.

Why RSS?

Our friends Anil Dash and Ernie Smith have recently written passionately and persuasively about the importance of RSS to the open web, and about how a technology that turns 25 years old this month remains both subversive and quite versatile. RSS-based distribution underpins a podcasting ecosystem that has allowed for shows to be distributed not just on Apple Podcasts but on Spotify, Google Podcasts, Pocket Casts, Overcast, and whatever other podcast player you might want to listen on. “Being able to say, ‘wherever you get your podcasts’ is a radical statement,” Dash wrote. “Because what it represents is the triumph of exactly the kind of technology that's supposed to be impossible: open, empowering tech that's not owned by any one company, that can't be controlled by any one company, and that allows people to have ownership over their work and their relationship with their audience.”

Crucially, a few different companies have figured out how to offer custom RSS for premium (paid) podcast feeds. This means any given show can have a normal, ad-supported feed for the general public, but can also have a feed that features ad-free content, bonus episodes, and bonus segments using a separate RSS feed for paid subscribers. 

Actually, the premium RSS feeds for podcasts aren’t usually just a single RSS feed for all of a show’s subscribers. They are individualized, custom RSS feeds that have identical content but have a unique URL for each individual paid subscriber. If a show has five paid subscribers, there will be five identical feeds with five different URLs. If it has 5,000 subscribers, there will be 5,000 identical feeds with 5,000 different URLs. By creating these unique feeds, podcasters can do member management. If someone unsubscribes, their individual feed will be turned off. If a subscriber takes their secret feed URL and posts it to Reddit or shares it with dozens of people (thereby making it not secret and giving away content that is supposed to be behind a paywall), that feed can similarly be disabled.

This is a system that works pretty well in the podcasting world, and has been done by a few different news websites, but is not widely utilized with written content. On Tedium, Smith explained that RSS has empowered podcasters, but that it needs a “creator economy rethink” for text.

We think, and hope, that a similar custom feed solution can strike the correct balance between making our work easy to access and read using whatever RSS reader you want without destroying the subscriber-funded business model that we are using and believe in, and which is fundamental to us being able to continue our journalism. 

What Happened When We Asked for Your Email Addresses

In January, we published an article explaining why we decided to put up an email “freewall” on all of our posts, meaning we now require an email registration to read the site. The wall was created for a few reasons. Low-effort AI scrapers were taking our articles and automatically posting them with various errors on content farm websites. But we also explained that, in part because of AI spam, a Google algorithm that seemed to be getting worse, and the fracturing of social media, we feared a future where we wouldn’t be able to reach our readers directly. 

The email wall has generally been very beneficial for us as a website and as a business. We have been able to get more free email subscribers, and a notable portion of those free email subscribers have valued our work enough to become paid subscribers. For the most part, it has had its intended effect. But the email wall has also broken other things. The wall has essentially broken the site’s RSS functionality, because RSS readers cannot see past the wall. This means that we unintentionally made our product worse for people who are paying us money. So we sought to fix this.

A Path Forward

We knew that RSS couldn’t see past our paywall soon after we launched the site. Until we turned the email wall on, however, this wasn’t much of a problem because almost all of our articles were not walled. After the wall went on, people using RSS could only read the first few lines of our articles. 

As far as we know, there were no existing integrations or plugins for Ghost, the content management system and site infrastructure we use, that can create a full-text RSS feed of a Ghost website (it is possible that it’s been done, but we searched far and wide in the Ghost Forums, asked some friends, and asked other people running Ghost sites, and no one was aware of any solutions). We saw one Ghost site that managed to make a single RSS feed of its paid content, but that feed got leaked, making it possible for anyone who had the link to bypass the paywall. Disabling that link would then break the feed for any paid readers who were using it. 

We reached out to a few services that do paid podcast RSS feeds to see if they would be able to develop a solution for us, but no one we asked had time to do it. 

Then we found FeedPress. FeedPress was able to take an API used by Ghost to create a single fulltext RSS feed, then was able to create the individualized feeds we needed as well. Outpost was then able to sync these feeds with Ghost’s membership API, meaning that each paid subscriber is assigned a custom feed. We are grateful to both companies for working with us to develop this so that we can provide it to our readers. Both FeedPress and Outpost have said they plan to offer this service to other Ghost publishers moving forward.

The fulltext RSS feed is a feature for paid subscribers only, because we had to pay for the development of this solution, and it will also cost us money every month to keep the feeds up and running.

We have tested the feed a fair bit and believe it should work well. But there may be some bumps in the road, so please let us know if you find anything broken or if your feed isn’t working for you for some reason. We were only able to afford the development work on this project because of our paid subscribers, and are proud that we’ve been able to take your membership fees and reinvest them into the company to make your member benefits better.

Jason is a cofounder of 404 Media. He was previously the editor-in-chief of Motherboard. He loves the Freedom of Information Act and surfing.
Jason Koebler
Sam Cole is writing from the far reaches of the internet, about sexuality, the adult industry, online culture, and AI. She's the author of How Sex Changed the Internet and the Internet Changed Sex.
Samantha Cole
Emanuel Maiberg is interested in little known communities and processes that shape technology, troublemakers, and petty beefs. Email him at [email protected]
More from Emanuel Maiberg
Emanuel Maiberg
Joseph is an award-winning investigative journalist focused on generating impact. His work has triggered hundreds of millions of dollars worth of fines, shut down tech companies, and much more.
Joseph Cox
Posted a year ago
Liked a year ago

Liked https://rootwebdesign.studio/articles/the-environmental-benefits-of-privacy-focussed-web-design/

The environmental benefits of privacy-focussed web design

Arguably two of the biggest problems in the web design industry today are the environmental impact of our online activities and the harvesting and misuse of our personal data.

In reality, these two issues are directly linked.

The tracking and storing of data requires a massive amount of infrastructure and energy. If we can reduce the number of tracking scripts on the web, we can not only be more responsible when it comes to data privacy, we can directly reduce the environmental impact of our online activities.

In this article, well look at some of the most invasive trackers being used almost as standard across business websites, explore some of the more ethical alternatives, and ask whether we can still make insights-based decisions without harvesting personal data&

Gain a deeper understanding of sustainable web design in our odd-monthly newsletter.

  • Google Analytics trackers are featured on 72.6% of the top 75,000 websites. Its location tracker Global Site Tag is used on 4.7 million sites, and Universal Analytics on a further 3.18 million sites.
  • Facebook collects more data from outside its ecosystem than from within it, with the Meta Pixel tracker present on 30% of the top 100,000 websites.
  • Cookie technology on the top 1 million websites generates more than 11,500 tonnes of carbon emissions every month.
  • Amazon allows third-party cookies from more than 80 companies, ranging from Facebook to mobile gaming giant King.
  • Email pixels, which can be used to detect if and when an email has been opened, what device has been used, and details about the recipients location, are present in more than two thirds of all emails.

The use of tracking scripts is now so widespread that it has been described as endemic. Aside from the ethics of these practices, the problem from a sustainable web design perspective is how much these scripts slow a website down, and how much more carbon they produce.

Each tracker is a file that sits in the shadows of a site and requires loading with the page. Even those do you want to accept cookies notifications that pop up need to load extra files to work, adding to the weight of web pages and generating more emissions in the process.

Trying to browse the internet without having to cede your personal data to the highest bidder has become a real challenge.

Even the smallest of business websites now seems to have cookie popups simultaneously telling us they value your privacy while harvesting data about who we are, where we are, what were looking for and what we were doing online before we landed there.

Tracking scripts have become so pervasive that they have effectively become an industry standard, and most businesses deploy them not only without question, but without consideration of what it means for customer privacy.

For years, companies like Google, Facebook and Amazon have been dishing out free software for people to use on their websites. These third-party scripts have provided website owners with a host of amazing functionality, ranging from analytics to video embeds and maps, often with the addition of only a single line of code. But these business behemoths arent charities, and their free tools have come at a price: consumer privacy.

Not only do many of these tracking scripts pass user data back to the third-party company that provided it, they pass it on to any other partner they are in cahoots with.

Some of the most common web trackers include:

  • Google Analytics  Tracks visits to a website, including information about where a visitor has come from (i.e. search, social media channels), where they have landed, how long they have spent on your site and which page they left. But it goes beyond these useful measurements to collect data about demographics, personal interests and affinity categories which are then fed back to Google.
  • Meta Pixel (formerly Facebook Pixel)  Tracks user behaviour and actions on a website  including page views, product views, adding to basket, purchases, links clicked, etc.  and uses it for targeted advertising, including for other companies. Pixel is installed on so many sites that Meta actually harvests more data from outside its social platform than it does from within it.
  • Google reCAPTCHA  Ostensibly a security-focussed script aimed at identifying and preventing bot activity, this invasive software collects a mind-boggling amount of user data. Among other things, it harvests IP addresses, Google user account information, behaviour on the page (such as typing patterns, scrolling, mouse movements, time spent completing forms, etc.), browser history and information about browser plug-ins.
  • Amazon trackers  As well as all the masses of data Amazon collects through its own-branded platforms, services and devices, it harvests data through tracking scripts installed on other websites, often through adverts or affiliate links.
  • YouTube embeds  Embedding videos on to your website might appear to improve the user experience, but it also gives YouTube access to their data. When visitor hits play on an embedded video, YouTube starts collecting data about views, where people are watching from and how long they are watching for.
  • Social media feeds  Social media can be an important tool for businesses, but the companies behind them are notorious data-gatherers. Adding a social feed to your website gives those companies access to your prospects, drawing them away from your website (bad for business) and exposing them to data collection (bad for individuals).
  • Ads  There are numerous ways advertisers can collect user data on the performance of ad campaigns, including through tracking URLs, tracking scripts, pixels and cookies. Using these trackers on your website gives ad companies access to user data on everything from views and clicks to their behaviour across multiple sessions and websites.

Theres no doubting that website analytics are a useful business tool. They let you measure traffic to your website and identify how people are engaging with your content, and this can help you make improvements to your both your website and your marketing.

Fathom Analytics measures your website’s page views without tracking your visitors personal data.

Here at Root, as an eco-friendly web design agency, we believe one of the best ways of reducing the carbon impact of a website is by implementing a considerate content strategy that prioritises quality over quantity. Analytics are key to this, because it means businesses can be more purposeful about their content. They can get rid of the content that gets no views, better target more useful questions, and bring down the overall size and emissions of their site.

But analysing your website traffic doesnt need to come at the expense of your visitors privacy. These ethical alternatives will give you all the insights you need to make informed improvements:

  • Fathom Analytics – This privacy-focussed analytics software is the ethical alternative to Google Analytics. It measures page views, time on site, bounce rate and goal completions alongside referral channels and link clicks, but without tracking the personal data of website visitors.
  • Buttondown – Email is one of a businesss best marketing tools, and Buttondown is one of the best privacy-focussed providers of newsletter software. Run by a single person who values digital privacy, Buttondown doesnt collect any data about you or your subscribers, and doesnt track opens or clicks. Trust is at the heart of an email newsletter, and this software makes that easy to uphold.
  • Mave.io – As a low-carbon web design studio, wed always advise against embedding video content directly into your website because of the impact on page-load speed and consequent emissions. But if youre looking for an ethical alternative to YouTube, mave.io is a fantastic privacy-focussed, EU-based (and GDPR compliant) video building and hosting platform.

Learn more about privacy-focussed software at Below Radar.

The Blacklight Privacy Inspector can help you identify if you have any invasive tracking scripts on your website.

The first step in being able to protect your users data and reduce your websites carbon emissions is knowing what tracking scripts you are using and where. These tools provide a useful starting point for making improvements.

  • Blacklight – This website privacy inspection tool lets you check what trackers and cookies are installed on your site, and identifies other more intrusive technologies like session recording and key logging. It also lets you know which companies this data is being sent to.
  • Digital Beacon – This fantastic tool estimates the carbon output of your website using key data on file transfer size, images, fonts and stylesheets. Crucially, it also measures the number of third-party trackers on your site, which, as well as compromising user privacy, add to the carbon footprint. The detailed report gives helpful suggestions about where improvements can be made, and keeps a log each time you test (up to 10) so you can see the impact of any changes over time.
  • Browser developer tools – Browsers like Firefox and Chrome (or it’s privacy focussed twin Brave) give you access to developer tools while you are viewing a live site, and these can give helpful information about the cookies installed and the files being loaded into a page. Simply go to the page you want to analyse, and navigate to the developer tools either by hitting F12 or navigating through the menu at the top of the browser to More Tools > Web Developer Tools. The Network tab lists all the files, and the Storage tab is where youll find the cookie information.

Read more about Tools for calculating your websites CO2 emissions.

Here at Root, we believe there needs to be a shift in both the collective mindset and the accepted industry standard for tracking everything we can, just in case it comes in handy one day.

As smaller, ethical businesses, we have a golden opportunity to do things differently and set the tone for a more privacy-focussed future; one thats not only better for our customers, but better for society, better for the planet, and better for businesses.

When youre considering whether to install any piece of tracking software, ask yourself these questions:

  1. Do I actually need to measure this data?
  2. Is this the only way of measuring this metric? For example, do you really need to measure email click-throughs when your website analytics already show page views and referrals?
  3. Do I have the time and skills to spend studying and understanding this data?
  4. If I do, do I also have the necessary skills and resources to action my findings?

If the answer to any of these questions is no, perhaps theres no need to install a tracker.

Consumer trust is arguably as important to a business as the products they sell or the services they deliver, yet few businesses give consideration to how they collect, use and share their customers online data.

The use of unethical, energy-guzzling tracking scripts have become all-pervasive, and we need a shift in thinking that begins to prioritise people, privacy and the planet. In this article, weve spoken about how we can be more thoughtful about the data we collect and how, in doing so, we can better protect our customers and the environment.

Weve looked at how:

  • Big tech company tracking scripts, which gather a massive amount of data, have become endemic
  • Website analytics software gathers more customer data than is either ethical or useful
  • There are ethical alternatives that put privacy first, but provide useful insights
  • Privacy-focussed data collection can lead to more purposeful business decision-making and more considered content creation
  • Being more thoughtful about the data we collect can protect our customers and align with our business ethics
  • Minimising tracking scripts can speed up our websites for a better user experience and a reduced environmental impact
  • How respecting our customers privacy benefits them, us, the whole of society, and the environment
  • Share by email
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Copy link

In this article we hope to raise awareness about sustainable web design and the impact our websites have on the environment. Well also explain how businesses can reduce their digital carbon emissions and take a more eco-friendly approach to operating online.

Video is one of the most popular forms of online content, however it’s also one of the least efficient. In this guide, well look at how to use video on your website while still prioritising sustainability.

In this guide, well explain how you can use images more efficiently on your website to make your website more environmentally friendly.

We explore the benefits of using Dark Mode on your website, and explain how you can enable it in your design to foster better user experiences.

  • Paul Jardine is a highly experienced web designer and developer from Manchester who has built many high-quality, low-carbon websites for businesses across the UK. As the founder of Root Web Design Studio, Paul is committed to the values of ethical design and business, prioritising the environment and sharing his knowledge of sustainable web design with others.
  • Becky Thorn�is the�Comma Chameleon, an experienced copywriter who helps small businesses to sell without the sleaze through purpose-led website copy, blog posts and other online content. By using language consciously, she helps businesses to market their products and services by inspiring genuine connection with their customers through education, understanding, and shared values.

Posted 2 years ago
Liked a year ago

Liked https://social.vivaldi.net/@brucelawson/112115624691714315

Bruce Lawson (@[email protected])

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://mastodon.social/@maelle/112116447689198295

MaοΏ½lle Salmon (@[email protected])

Posted Permalink
Liked a year ago

Liked https://ohhelloana.blog/just-get-a-website/

Liked a year ago
NewerOlder
EmailInstagramGithub

Grant Richmond
grant.codes[email protected]